Several weeks ago, I introduced a new style of author and character interviews—the Interactive Author Interview and the Interactive Character Interview. In this new style, I do away with the traditional list of questions but instead invite the author into a fictional setting for a comfortable, friendly chat. In the character interview, the author takes us into his world for the interview, and we get to meet and observe the character being interviewed in his own environment. This style makes both the author and the character more real, and here are a few things people said about their experience being interview this way:
“I’ve never been a fan of interviews, but once I was warmed up in towards the beginning of Kelly’s interview, I had a blast!” – Ted Covey
“It was a pleasure to have gone through the process with Kelly…If one has the opportunity, I would strongly recommend other authors set up time to be interviewed by her.” – Daryl Ball
“Kelly Blanchard’s story style interviews are no end of fun and fascination.” – Ryan T. Nelson
“Interview with Kelly Blanchard is set apart because interacting with her didn’t feel one bit like I was answering a staid questionnaire.” – Vibhuti Bhandarkar
“Kelly’s author interviews are a fascinating experience for any author.” – Valerie Seimas
And there is much more authors have said about the experience, but I realized there was one other group of people whose opinion of these interviews are vital—the readers. While this style of interviews solves many problems with the standard author and character interviews and thus making the process all the more enjoyable, what would the readers think? So I asked for volunteers.
I took an author I hadn’t interviewed yet—Ronnie Virdi, author of ‘Grave Beginnings‘. I interviewed him with both styles of author interviews then used both styles of character interviews with his character. Then I presented both sets of interviews to 23 volunteer of readers, and I asked them which style they preferred and why. Here are the results:
- 17 people voted the Interactive Interviews for both the author and character interviews.
- 6 people voted the Traditional InterviewsOf those 6 people:
- 2 were leaning towards the Interactive Interview for the author interview
- 4 voted Traditional Interview for the author interview, but they chose Interactive Interview for the character interview.
- Out of 23 people, 21 people voted Interactive Interviews for the character interviews.
- Only 2 people voted for the Traditional Interviews for both author interview & character interview.
Here is what readers said about their experience reading these interviews:
“I like the interactive style better. Nothing draws another writer in more than a story, and it gives you more to think about than a bulleted list of questions.” – Kelly Blechertas
“The interactive one gives a lot more feel for the author as a person. It feels like a more intimate and friendly exchange, and it gives me a sense of their potential writing voice.” – Megan Reed
“I enjoyed the interactive interview more. The regular interview was informative but felt like I was reading it in a magazine or watching it on TV; whereas the interactive engaged not only my intellectual side, but spoke to that part of me that gets lost in stories.” – G. Scot Phillips
“Interactive interview by far, most prominently for the fact that once he gets into the world, it is easier to phrase the answers in his own comfortable way, complete with mood defining subtext. The whole mechanism is comfy.” – Jack Frost
“The traditional interview felt all clinical, I don’t really like those. I read interviews to “meet” people. I definitely liked the interactive better because it felt more like meeting a person.” – Adrienne Devine
Now, not everyone liked the Interactive, and here are some reasonings of those who preferred the traditional:
“I prefer the traditional question and answer. In the interactive one, I find myself searching for the questions and answers, ignoring the rest.” – Kim Hutchinson Halcomb
“The traditional one. It could be that its just what I’m used to, but I had a hard time paying attention kinda in the interactive one.” – Sara Lucinda
“If I’m being honest, I am partial to the traditional. I’m not really sure why. There’s nothing wrong with the interactive, it’s fun and engaging, but I think I just prefer the more traditional interview.” – Sabrina Danielle
“I guess it would depend on WHY I was reading the interview. I definitely felt like I learned more about Ronnie’s writing from the traditional interview though I may have gotten a better sense of who he was from the interactive.” – Valerie Seimas
“Depends upon my mood honestly. To read the interactive one – the one set like a story – I have to be in the mood and prepared for it. Knowing what style/what to expect, there will be times where I am more receptive to it. If I were to just be gleaming for information, I like the style of the traditional one.” – Jennifer Ruvalcaba
So, what is the verdict? Among authors and readers, the Interactive Interviews are largely popular, but there is still a place for the Traditional Interviews. The traditional style interviews are readily available to anyone who wants to conduct interviews. Sample questions are just a Google search away. However, the Interactive approach is much more involved and time-consuming to conduct because each experience is tailored to each author, but it is an option for those who just want to have a more fun interviewing experience.
To read some Interactive Interviews, you may find them on my other blog, “Meeting with the Muse“. If you’ve published a book and would like me to interview you using this interactive style of interviews, and if you would like the interviews to be promoted on my site, leave a comment, and I’ll be in touch with you.